The Bangladesh Bank’s recent decision to merge underperforming banks with stronger counterparts has stirred anxiety and uncertainty within the banking sector. Critics argue that merging ailing banks with healthier ones may not effectively resolve the underlying issues but could instead burden the healthy banks. Concerns also revolve around transparency and accountability, particularly regarding default loans and banking irregularities. The merger approach, critics argue, risks shielding those responsible for financial misconduct.
Meanwhile, proponents of the mergers believe they offer a solution, yet skeptics highlight the need for comprehensive governance reforms beyond mere consolidation. The merger policy’s provisions, including the potential return of directors and executives from underperforming banks to merged entities, have drawn significant criticism for rewarding perpetrators instead of holding them accountable. However, recent events, such as a rush to withdraw funds from banks slated for merger, underscore the challenges and complexities inherent in this process.
Source for more details:
